《捕鼠者》电影由琳恩·拉姆塞执导,琳恩·拉姆塞编剧。汤米·弗拉纳根,MandyMatth等明星主演的剧情,电影,更多关于《捕鼠者》的精彩内容请持续关注小红帽影院。
《捕鼠者》是一部充满暗黑与希望的小说,通过描述詹姆斯的成长历程,展现了人性的复杂性和对生活的不同态度。詹姆斯是一个普通的孩子,他的生活并不容易。他的父母离异,他的母亲沉迷赌博,他的父亲则沉迷酒精。他的家庭环境让他感到孤独和无助。然而,他并没有放弃对幸福的追求。他与朋友们一起玩耍,虽然生活并不完美,但他仍然保持着对未来的希望。然而,当詹姆斯的朋友赖安去世时,他的世界彻底崩塌了。他被卷入了一场谋杀案的调查中,而他自己也成了嫌疑犯。这个年轻的男孩不得不面对警察的盘问和社区的怀疑。尽管他对这个世界感到困惑和恐惧,但他仍然坚持寻找真相,并为自己和赖安伸张正义。《捕鼠者》通过詹姆斯的故事,揭示了社会的黑暗面和人性的复杂性。在这个充满罪恶和痛苦的世界中,詹姆斯仍然保持着对美好事物的向往和对爱的渴望。他的坚持和勇气让他成为一个真正的英雄,他的故事也让我们思考我们自己对生活的态度和选择。《捕鼠者》是一部令人深思的小说,它通过揭示人性的复杂性和对美好事物的追求,向我们展示了生活的真实与希望。这个故事告诉我们,即使在最黑暗的时刻,我们仍然可以找到光明和力量。 更多关于《捕鼠者》的精彩内容请持续关注小红帽影院。
《捕鼠者》别名:捕鼠器。 又名:Ratcatcher,该片于1999-11-12上映,制片国家/地区为英国。该片时长共94分钟,语言对白英语,最新状态HD。该片评分8.2分,观看人数6532人,更多关于《捕鼠者》的精彩内容请持续关注小红帽影院。
《捕鼠者》是一部发生在1973年的电影,故事发生在格拉斯哥。主人公詹姆斯度过了一个不太顺利的夏天。炎热的天气使他感到疲惫不堪,而清洁工人的大罢工使街道变得一片垃圾。然而,最让詹姆斯困扰的是他朋友赖安的死,这与他有着千丝万缕的联系。整个故事通过詹姆斯的视角展开,展示了一个肮脏不堪的世界。尽管詹姆斯感到茫然和犹豫,但他的目光中仍然透露出对未来的渴望和对爱情的向往。在一个无人知晓的地方,一个幼小的灵魂不断被痛苦所折磨和锤炼。然而,作为代价,它将绽放出最令人惊叹的纯净光芒。
这篇影评可能有剧透
A history context analysis on the British Realism Film Ratcatcher
Ratcatcher is the first feature-length film by British female director Lynn Ramsay. Since being released in 1999, it has won lots of awards at various film festivals, because of not only the delicacy of its shooting but also its profound reflection on British society in the 1970s.

This contemporary film’s realistic focus on the working class inherits the spirit of social realism in the British New Wave in the 1950s and 1960s. At that time, on the one hand, the British economy was devastated by the war, the middle class was weakened and the working class appealed to a fair and stable social environment (Winson, 2013, p. 22). On the other hand, the success of the Soviet Union has raised people’s doubts about the capitalist system. Hence, the image of the “angry young men” began to appear in literature and film, usually showing the discontent of the working class with class society (Luo, 2019, p. 24). The films of this period are known as British New Wave and social realism, or working-class realism from the content, poetic realism from style.
Furthermore, the Labor party, which represented the interest of the working class, began to dominate in parliament, and strongly promoted nationalization and welfare policies. However, after some degree of economic recovery, the defects of the welfare system unveiled gradually and led to stagflation (Winson, 2013, pp. 5-6). Until 1975, Margaret Thatcher of the Conservative party came to power and advocated neoliberalism, cutting welfare spending, and encouraging market competition (Scott-Samuel et al, 2014, p. 54). The British economy was boosted but also brought a widening of the class division and the decline in the living quality of the working class. Therefore, in the 1980s, British social realism was revived and lots of films focusing on the working class appeared again (Shafer, 2001, p. 9). The story of Ratcatcher happens in 1973 and reflects the life of the working class at the end of the welfare society, many of the details in the film are closely related to the social background at that time.
l Laborers and RatsRats is perhaps a metaphor for laborers. The welfare system provides enough living security and seriously discourages the laborers’ enthusiasm for work. The traditional virtue of labor is replaced by the lazy pleasure of consumerism (Zhang & Lin, 2018, p. 40). In the film, James’ father is a representative of the working class, sleeps all day instead of working, indulges in TV, beer, and football. His only wish is for the committee to allocate a new house.

Moreover, any attempt to reduce welfare will cause public discontent, like this cleaning workers’ strike. The garbage in the streets and the television news reports all hint at this situation.

Under this circumstance, tax revenue falls but welfare spending stays high. The government is in a passive position and the national economy is in a downturn. The working class does not create social value but lives in the burrow of the welfare system like the rat. The strike in the film leads to a chaotic community where rats live with people, implying they are homogenous, dirty, poor, and living at the bottom. The ratcatcher is referring to the coming Thatcher reforms, to the abolition of the welfare state and the elimination of the welfare-dependent working class. At the end of the film, the army, representing the government, is deployed to clean up rats and rubbish, while residents shout abuse upstairs.

As a female director, Ramsay pays deep attention to gender identity. The identity of the male is lost at that time. When livelihoods depend on welfare, the role of men as the source of income is weakened. By contrast, when the center of life moves from society, the public sphere, to family, the private sphere, consumerism overwhelms the culture of the working-class, the status of the female is promoted (Zhang & Lin, 2018, p. 40). Therefore, for the male, on the one hand, they feel a sense of marginalization in this loss of identity, so they try to acquire a sense of self-satisfaction through a kind of arbitrary, which includes contempt for the female and arrogance towards their juniors, such as James’ father slaps his wife when drunk or the teenagers humiliate Margaret and tease James and Kenny.

On the other hand, soccer, as a sport that relies on unity and physical strength, becomes the last symbol of working-class culture, and the spiritual sustenance of the male. In the film, boys play soccer in the street, James’ father persistently gives James a pair of soccer shoes as a gift, and even the teenagers throw Kenny’s mouse back and forth like soccer.

In the Ratcatcher, children may be more like “angry young men”. The story is narrated from the perspective of James, a child. Compared with the frustration of adults, children’s psychological activities are more complicated. Vitality is a child’s nature, which is suppressed by a negative social atmosphere. The desire of young men to break through the social hierarchy by working hard is limited by a lazy welfare system, like carrying the death of a friend.

Water is perhaps a metaphor for the welfare system. Water can either support life or deprive it. The bathtub full of water brings James happiness, but the endless sewage in the canal drowns his friend like an overdose of welfare, which is gently but fatal, so neither James nor his friend struggles in the canal.
Therefore, children are the only ones having hopes for the future, because the future is an escape from reality, which is the origin of the poetic element. The suburban house for James and the moon for Kenny, are all the places with poetic background music, and without water.

Furthermore, under this repression, children are eager to grow up and have a voice, so they imitate the elders. James tried to join the teenagers and control his sisters. Whereas, when the suburban house is locked and Margaret is still humiliated by the teenagers, James realizes his helplessness and gives up and suicides in the canal. But for Kenny, after being rescued from the canal, he joins the camp of ratcatcher.

Ratcatcher is a calm and slow film. What Ramsay expresses is not simple criticism of Thatcherism or sympathy on the working-class, but the two-sidedness of policies and their great impact on the public. After two decades of Thatcher's policies, it is worth wondering what Britain is and about to face.
Word Count: 1080
(excluding 84 words on remarks of figures)
l Reference List (APA)
Calderwood, A. (Producer). Ramsay, L. (Screenwriter/ Director). (1999). Ratcatcher [Motion Picture]. Britain: British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC).
Luo, X. (2019). 论英国新浪潮电影的“厨房水槽”现实主义美学特征 [the Realistic Aesthetic Characteristics of "Kitchen Sink" in British New Wave Films]. Journal of Guizhou University (Art Edition), 33(2), 22-26. doi: 10.15958/j.cnki.gdxbysb.2019.02.004
Scott-Samuel, A., Bambra, C., Collins, C., Hunter, D. J., McCartney, G., & Smith, K. (2014). The impact of Thatcherism on health and well-being in Britain. International Journal of Health Services, 44(1), 53-71. Retrieved from JSTOR Journals. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/45140692
Shafer, S. C. (2001). An overview of the working class in British feature film from the 1960s to the 1980s: from class consciousness to marginalization. International Labor and Working-Class History. (59), 3-14. Retrieved from JSTOR Journals. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27672706
Winson, A. (2013). Social realism of British New Wava “Left” films: The working-class border character. (Master’s Thesis) Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database.
Zhang, J., & Lin X. (2018). 20世纪八九十年代英国工人阶级电影特征 [The characteristics of working class in British working class films in the 1980s and 1990s]. Movie Literature, (10), 39-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0495-5692.2018.10.013
更多关于《捕鼠者》的精彩内容请持续关注小红帽影院。